The very first Lord’s Supper is usually referred to as the “Last Supper.” It is recorded in Matt. 26:26-29; Mark 14:22-25; Luke 22:14-20; and I Cor. 11:23-26. This “supper” was the annual Passover meal instituted in Ex 12:1-28. The following day, Jesus willingly became the perfect and final Passover sacrifice (See I Cor. 5:7).

In referring to this “supper,” when Jesus said, “This do in remembrance of me,” what exactly did He mean? Is it possible Jesus was saying we should use our regular mealtimes as a “remembrance” of the sacrifice He made for us?

The culture in which this “remembrance” began was quite different from ours. The Greek word, translated “bread,” actually means a loaf of bread or a thin cake. This naturally had to be broken into individual-sized portions. In that period of history, bread was a staple of most meals, so this “breaking of the bread” was a natural part of eating the meal. Knowing this, Jesus may have simply been telling them to use this normal act of “breaking the bread” as a reminder of His body, which was “broken” to cover our sins.

This mealtime concept might also apply to drinking the “fruit of the vine.” Considering the time in history and the vineyards in Palestine, grape juice and wine were probably the most common drinks served at mealtime. Either of these would easily serve as a “reminder” of the blood of Jesus, which was shed for our redemption.

Several passages of Scripture seem to show that the Lord’s Supper was observed at mealtimes by the early Christians. In Acts 2:41-46, it’s fairly clear the early believers “broke bread” together on a daily basis. This suggests the passage is referring to daily meals. Verse 42 lists the “breaking of bread” along with learning the apostles doctrine, sharing fellowship, and prayers. This daily “breaking of bread” probably refers to the act of “remembering” the broken body of the Lord, as they broke the mealtime bread into individual pieces.

In I Cor. 11:17-34, Paul is talking about the Lord’s Supper being observed at a regular meal, by a group of people gathered together for this purpose. Some of the people were evidently coming only to gorge themselves on the food and get drunk on the wine, which was the reason for Paul’s rebuke in this passage.

Acts 20:7 says the believers “broke bread” on the first day of the week. However, please note the fact that it was evening, not morning. The “breaking of bread” was very likely observed during the regular evening meal.

The answer to the original question becomes more difficult in the 20th century. Most of us do not live in communal fashion, as the earliest saints did (Acts 2:44-46.) Many of us do not have bread or wine with our meals as was customary in those days. Many of us eat “on the run” much of the time, because of our busy schedules. And many of us may not have a group of Christians with whom we regularly meet. In searching for a way to obey what our Lord asked us to do, we may have to seek new alternatives.

I can’t find any evidence in Scripture that indicates this “remembrance” has to be observed with other people. I find no Scriptural reason why the Lord’s Supper shouldn’t be observed as a private personal “remembrance.” When Jesus said, “do this…,” He didn’t say, “do this in a group setting.” He simply said, “do this, in remembrance of me.”

The point of the “remembrance” is not in following perfect formality, properly scheduled frequency and time of day, being in a certain location, or even in using precisely correct elements. Rules concerning the Lord’s Supper are man-made and without Scriptural authority from our Lord. The point of the “remembrance” is simply to remember and give thanks with a sincere and reverent attitude (See I Cor. 11:27-29).

Another thought to consider is the possibility that Jesus intended this “Supper” to be observed only at Passover time, as a “remembrance” that He is our Passover Lamb (1Cor. 5:7-8). Did the early believers get “carried away” by observing the Lord’s Supper more often than Jesus intended? I wonder.

Above from Marti Mikl : 

I have wondered about these same two possibilities for a long time. Somehow our “pinch and sip” just does not seem to be what Jesus intended.

Luke 22:15-20   And he said to them, “I have eagerly desired to eat this Passover with you before I suffer. For I tell you, I will not eat it again until it finds fulfillment in the kingdom of God.” After taking the cup, he gave thanks and said, “Take this and divide it among you. For I tell you I will not drink again of the fruit of the vine until the kingdom of God comes.” And he took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body given for you; do this in remembrance of me.” In the same way, after the supper he took the cup, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you.

“Do this”? Just exactly what is “this.”




Filed under Church of Christ, Religion

2 responses to “THE LORD’S SUPPER — I WONDER

  1. Excellent thoughts! I’ve struggled with how we *do* the *Lord’s Supper* for a long time. You raise some excellent points here.
    In Acts 20:7 since Eutychus fell from the third floor sometime after midnight and they broke bread after that–it had to actually be on Monday morning.
    Whether it was God’s plan or not, I don’t know, but it seems the early Christians broke bread every time they got together–and they were together every day!

  2. Frank

    “Do this” = “eat food”
    “For my remembrance” = “lovingly”
    When they ate together, they were to love one another. In being loving, they proclaimed Jesus.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s